Phase I therapy study with (186)Re-labeled humanized monoclonal antibody BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Article Details

Citation
Copy to clipboard

Borjesson PK, Postema EJ, Roos JC, Colnot DR, Marres HA, van Schie MH, Stehle G, de Bree R, Snow GB, Oyen WJ, van Dongen GA

Phase I therapy study with (186)Re-labeled humanized monoclonal antibody BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1;9(10 Pt 2):3961S-72S.

PubMed ID
14506195 [ View in PubMed
]
Abstract

PURPOSE: In previous studies, we have shown the potential of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with (186)Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody (MAb) U36 for treatment of head and neck cancer. A limitation of this anti-CD44v6 MAb, however, appeared to be its immunogenicity, resulting in human antichimeric antibodies in 40% of the patients. Aiming for a less immunogenic anti-CD44v6 MAb, the humanized MAb BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) was introduced. In the present Phase I RIT study, we determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential of (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty patients with inoperable recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma received a single dose of (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in radiation dose-escalation steps of 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mCi/m(2). Three patients received a second dose at least 3 months after the initial dose. After each administration, whole-body images as well as planar and tomographic images of the head and neck region were obtained, and the pharmacokinetics and the development of human antihuman antibody responses were determined. Radiation absorbed doses were calculated for whole body, red marrow, organs, and tumor. RESULTS: First and second administrations were all well tolerated, and targeting of tumor lesions proved to be excellent. The only significant manifestations of toxicity were dose-limiting myelotoxicity consisting of thrombo- and leukocytopenia and, to a lesser extent, oral mucositis (grade 2). Grade 4 myelotoxicity was seen in two patients treated with 60 mCi/m(2). The MTD was established at 50 mCi/m(2), at which level dose-limiting myelotoxicity was seen in one of six patients. Stable disease, varying between 6 and 21 weeks, was observed in three of six patients treated at the MTD level. The median tumor dose, recalculated to MTD level, was 12.4 Gy. The absorbed dose in red marrow was 1.82 +/- 0.11 cGy/mCi for males and 2.35 +/- 0.10 for females. Two patients experienced a human antihuman antibody response. Pharmacokinetics showed consistency across patients and within the three patients receiving (186)Re-BIWA 4 on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 can safely be administered, also in a repeated way. The MTD was established at 50 mCi/m(2). In comparison with the previously described anti-CD44v6 MAb U36, the humanized MAb BIWA 4 seems to be less immunogenic. The fact that antitumor effects were seen in incurable patients with bulky disease justifies the evaluation of RIT with (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in an adjuvant setting.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Drugs