Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonists in benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin in a fixed dose and terazosin in increasing doses.

Article Details

Citation

Lee E, Lee C

Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonists in benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin in a fixed dose and terazosin in increasing doses.

Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):606-11.

PubMed ID
9352700 [ View in PubMed
]
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed dose (0.2 mg) of tamsulosin, a selective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonist, with an increasing dose (1-5 mg) of terazosin, a non-selective antagonist, in the treatment of urinary outflow obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Korean patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised a single-blind and randomized design with tamsulosin or terazosin taken once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 98 patients was enrolled, with 72 patients included in the analyses after 4 and 8 weeks. The primary variables assessed were changes in the maximum urinary flow rate Qmax and the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), with the post-void residual urine volume, 'obstructive' and 'irritative' questions in the IPSS, and the investigators' global assessment of efficacy also determined. The number of patients with a clinically significant response to treatment with tamsulosin or terazosin was determined and defined as those with > 20% improvement from the baseline Qmax or > 20% decrease in total IPSS. Adverse reactions possibly or probably related to study medication were recorded throughout the treatment period. RESULTS: Both tamsulosin and terazosin produced similar significant improvements in subjective and objective symptoms of urinary outflow obstruction (P > 0.05). Systolic and diastolic (standing) blood pressures decreased significantly in patients treated with terazosin (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions, most frequently dry mouth and dizziness which were usually mild and transient, were significantly higher in patients on terazosin (18 patients, versus one on tamsulosin, P < 0.001). The changes led to discontinuation of therapy in two patients on terazosin. CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin was as effective as terazosin in treating urinary outflow obstruction associated with BPH, but had a markedly better safety profile.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Drug Targets
DrugTargetKindOrganismPharmacological ActionActions
TamsulosinAlpha-1A adrenergic receptorProteinHumans
Yes
Antagonist
Details
TerazosinAlpha-1A adrenergic receptorProteinHumans
Yes
Antagonist
Details