Comparison of analgesic efficacy of epidural methadone or ropivacaine/methadone with or without pre-operative oral tepoxalin in dogs undergoing tuberositas tibiae advancement surgery.
Article Details
- CitationCopy to clipboard
Bosmans T, Piron K, Oosterlinck M, Gasthuys F, Duchateau L, Waelbers T, Samoy Y, Van Vynckt D, Polis I
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of epidural methadone or ropivacaine/methadone with or without pre-operative oral tepoxalin in dogs undergoing tuberositas tibiae advancement surgery.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012 Nov;39(6):618-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00744.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
- PubMed ID
- 22726277 [ View in PubMed]
- Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of four analgesia protocols in dogs undergoing tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded study. ANIMALS: Thirty-two client owned dogs undergoing TTA-surgery. METHODS: Dogs (n = 8 per treatment) received an oral placebo (PM and PRM) or tepoxalin (10 mg kg(-1) ) tablet (TM and TRM) once daily for 1 week before surgery. Epidural methadone (0.1 mg kg(-1) ) (PM and TM) or the epidural combination methadone (0.1 mg kg(-1) )/ropivacaine 0.75% (1.65 mg kg(-1) ) (PRM and TRM) was administered after induction of anaesthesia. Intra-operative fentanyl requirements (2 mug kg(-1) IV) and end-tidal isoflurane concentration after 60 minutes of anaesthesia (Fe'ISO(60) ) were recorded. Post-operative analgesia was evaluated hourly from 1 to 8 and at 20 hours post-extubation with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the University of Melbourne Pain Scale (UMPS). If VAS > 50 and/or UMPS > 10, rescue methadone (0.1 mg kg(-1) ) was administered IV. Analgesic duration (time from epidural until post-operative rescue analgesia) and time to standing were recorded. Normally distributed variables were analysed with an F-test (alpha = 0.05) or t-test for pairwise inter-treatment comparisons (Bonferonni adjusted alpha = 0.0083). Non-normally distributed data were analysed with the Kruskall-Wallis test (alpha = 0.05 or Bonferonni adjusted alpha = 0.005 for inter-treatment comparison of post-operative pain scores). RESULTS: More intra-operative analgesia interventions were required in PM [2 (0-11)] [median (range)] and TM [2 (1-2)] compared to PRM (0) and TRM (0). Fe'ISO(60) was significantly lower in (PRM + TRM) compared to (PM + TM). Analgesic duration was shorter in PM (459 +/- 276 minutes) (mean +/- SD) and TM (318 +/- 152 minutes) compared to TRM (853 +/- 288 minutes), but not to PRM (554 +/- 234 minutes). Times to standing were longer in the ropivacaine treatments compared to TM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Inclusion of epidural ropivacaine resulted in reduction of Fe'ISO(60) , avoidance of intra-operative fentanyl administration, a longer duration of post-operative analgesia (in TRM) and a delay in time to standing compared to TM.
DrugBank Data that Cites this Article
- Drugs