Loratadine blockade of K(+) channels in human heart: comparison with terfenadine under physiological conditions.

Article Details

Citation

Copy to clipboard

Crumb WJ Jr

Loratadine blockade of K(+) channels in human heart: comparison with terfenadine under physiological conditions.

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 Jan;292(1):261-4.

PubMed ID

10604956 [ View in PubMed

]

Abstract

Recently, there has been considerable attention focused on drugs that prolong the QT interval of the electrocardiogram, with the H(1)-receptor antagonist class of drugs figuring prominently. Albeit rare, incidences of QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias, in particular torsade de pointes, have been reported with the antihistamines astemizole and terfenadine and more recently with loratadine. The most likely mechanism for these drug-related arrhythmias is blockage of one or more ion channels involved in cardiac repolarization. Several studies have demonstrated block of multiple cardiac K(+) channels by terfenadine, including I(to), I(sus), I(K1), and I(Kr) or human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG). In contrast to terfenadine, previous studies have shown the antihistamine loratadine to be virtually free of cardiac ion channel-blocking effects. This disparity in the lack of any significant cardiac ion channel-blocking effect and the existence of numerous adverse cardiac event reports for loratadine prompted the comparison of the human cardiac K(+) channel-blocking profile for loratadine and terfenadine under physiological conditions [37 degrees C, holding potential (V(hold)) = -75 mV] with the whole-cell patch-clamp method. Isolated human atrial myocytes were used to examine drug effects on I(to), I(sus), and I(K1), whereas HERG was studied in stably transfected HEK cells. In contrast to previous studies in nonhuman systems and/or under nonphysiological conditions, terfenadine (1 microM) had no effect on I(to), I(sus), or I(K1) at pacing rates up to 3 Hz. Similar results were found for 1 microM loratadine. However, both drugs potently blocked HERG current amplitude, with a mean IC(50) of 173 nM for loratadine and 204 nM for terfenadine (pacing rate, 0.1 Hz). Neither drug exhibited any significant use-dependent blockage of HERG (pacing rates = 0.1-3 Hz). These results point to a similarity in the human cardiac K(+) channel-blocking effects of loratadine and terfenadine and provide a possible mechanism for the arrhythmias associated with the use of either drug.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Drug Targets

Drug	Target	Kind	Organism	Pharmacological Action	Actions
Loratadine	Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2	Protein	Humans	Unknown	Antagonist	Details