Correlations between clinical and physiological consequences of the novel mutation R878C in a highly conserved pore residue in the cardiac Na+ channel.

Article Details

Citation

Zhang Y, Wang T, Ma A, Zhou X, Gui J, Wan H, Shi R, Huang C, Grace AA, Huang CL, Trump D, Zhang H, Zimmer T, Lei M

Correlations between clinical and physiological consequences of the novel mutation R878C in a highly conserved pore residue in the cardiac Na+ channel.

Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2008 Dec;194(4):311-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2008.01883.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.

PubMed ID
18616619 [ View in PubMed
]
Abstract

AIM: We compared the clinical and physiological consequences of the novel mutation R878C in a highly conserved pore residue in domain II (S5-S6) of human, hNa(v)1.5, cardiac Na(+) channels. METHODS: Full clinical evaluation of pedigree members through three generations of a Chinese family combined with SCN5A sequencing from genomic DNA was compared with patch and voltage-clamp results from two independent expression systems. RESULTS: The four mutation carriers showed bradycardia, and slowed sino-atrial, atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction. Two also showed sick sinus syndrome; two had ST elevation in leads V1 and V2. Unlike WT-hNa(v)1.5, whole-cell patch-clamped HEK293 cells expressing R878C-hNa(v)1.5 showed no detectable Na(+) currents (i(Na)), even with substitution of a similarly charged lysine residue. Voltage-clamped Xenopus oocytes injected with either 0.04 or 1.5 microg microL(-1) R878C-hNa(v)1.5 cRNA similarly showed no i(Na), yet WT-hNa(v)1.5 cRNA diluted to 0.0004-0.0008 ng microL(-1)resulted in expression of detectable i(Na). i(Na) was simply determined by the amount of injected WT-hNa(v)1.5: doubling the dose of WT-hNa(v)1.5 cRNA doubled i(Na). i(Na) amplitudes and activation and inactivation characteristics were similar irrespective of whether WT-hNa(v)1.5 cRNA was given alone or combined with equal doses of R878C-hNa(v)1.5 cRNA therefore excluding dominant negative phenotypic effects. Na(+) channel function in HEK293 cells transfected with R878C-hNa(v)1.5 was not restored by exposure to mexiletine (200 microM) and lidocaine (100 microM). Fluorescence confocal microscopy using E3-Nav1.5 antibody demonstrated persistent membrane expression of both WT and R878C-hNa(v)1.5. Modelling studies confirmed that such i(Na) reductions reproduced the SSS phenotype. CONCLUSION: Clinical consequences of the novel R878C mutation correlate with results of physiological studies.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Polypeptides
NameUniProt ID
Sodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaQ14524Details