Comparison of extraction techniques of robenidine from poultry feed samples.

Article Details

Citation
Copy to clipboard

Wilga J, Wasik AK, Namiesnik J

Comparison of extraction techniques of robenidine from poultry feed samples.

Talanta. 2007 Oct 31;73(5):812-9. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.04.046. Epub 2007 May 10.

PubMed ID
19073106 [ View in PubMed
]
Abstract

In this paper, effectiveness of six different commonly applied extraction techniques for the determination of robenidine in poultry feed has been compared. The sample preparation techniques included shaking, Soxhlet, Soxtec, ultrasonically assisted extraction, microwave - assisted extraction and accelerated solvent extraction. Comparison of these techniques was done with respect to the recovery extraction, temperature and time, reproducibility and solvent consumption. Every single extract was subjected to clean - up using aluminium oxide column (Pasteur pipette filled with 1g of aluminium oxide), from which robenidine was eluted with 10ml of methanol. The eluate from the clean-up column was collected in a volumetric flask, and finally it was analysed by HPLC-DAD-MS. In general, all extraction techniques were capable of isolating of robenidine from poultry feed, but the recovery obtained using modern extraction techniques was higher than that obtained using conventional techniques. In particular, accelerated solvent extraction was more superior to other techniques, which highlights the advantages of this sample preparation technique. However, in routine analysis, shaking and ultrasonically assisted extraction is still the preferred method for the solution of robenidine and other coccidiostatics.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Drugs