Characterizing Protease Specificity: How Many Substrates Do We Need?

Article Details

Citation
Copy to clipboard

Schauperl M, Fuchs JE, Waldner BJ, Huber RG, Kramer C, Liedl KR

Characterizing Protease Specificity: How Many Substrates Do We Need?

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0142658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142658. eCollection 2015.

PubMed ID
26559682 [ View in PubMed
]
Abstract

Calculation of cleavage entropies allows to quantify, map and compare protease substrate specificity by an information entropy based approach. The metric intrinsically depends on the number of experimentally determined substrates (data points). Thus a statistical analysis of its numerical stability is crucial to estimate the systematic error made by estimating specificity based on a limited number of substrates. In this contribution, we show the mathematical basis for estimating the uncertainty in cleavage entropies. Sets of cleavage entropies are calculated using experimental cleavage data and modeled extreme cases. By analyzing the underlying mathematics and applying statistical tools, a linear dependence of the metric in respect to 1/n was found. This allows us to extrapolate the values to an infinite number of samples and to estimate the errors. Analyzing the errors, a minimum number of 30 substrates was found to be necessary to characterize substrate specificity, in terms of amino acid variability, for a protease (S4-S4') with an uncertainty of 5 percent. Therefore, we encourage experimental researchers in the protease field to record specificity profiles of novel proteases aiming to identify at least 30 peptide substrates of maximum sequence diversity. We expect a full characterization of protease specificity helpful to rationalize biological functions of proteases and to assist rational drug design.

DrugBank Data that Cites this Article

Drugs